https://blog.spacehey.comForum Topic created by Explorer of Wonderhttps://forum.spacehey.com/reply?id=853604https://forum.spacehey.com/reply?id=853604>an aspirated-unaspirated distinction with the plosives instead of voiced-unvoiced. I don't get convinced by this, maybe we can have a lot of liquits consonants? Like: ɾ, ɽ, l And also nasals to get my beloved Ñ: ɲ, m, n, ɴ And to complete the postalveolar column we can add: d and t to make the classic couple and we have 9 consonants easy no?Sat, 20 Dec 2025 03:31:52 +0000https://forum.spacehey.com/reply?id=851455https://forum.spacehey.com/reply?id=851455im in favour of it sounding more natural and leaning towards a simpler but sliightly unusual set of consonants Like maybe we could have an aspirated-unaspirated distinction with the plosives instead of voiced-unvoiced, regular m and n nasals and two sibilant fricatives: s and ɕ . I should prolly add something else but I can't think of anything elseMon, 08 Dec 2025 21:45:54 +0000